Imagine an algebra problem with potentially fatal
consequences: a train leaves the station going 35 mph, with stops. Thirty
minutes later an express train departs on the same track going 35 mph, no
stops. Will the first train reach an exit at mile 25 before the second train
catches up?
On Sunday evening, November 26, 1905, the answer was
"No."
Although trains had been around for more than fifty years, train
safety was still an evolving process. At the time of this accident some systems
had electric-powered signals - semaphore arms by day and lights by night - to
signify that another train was ahead. Additionally, if operators on a leading
train thought there was a chance a following train might catch up, a flagman on
the rear car (not always a caboose) would periodically throw red 'fusees'
(flares) off the back. These were designed to burn for about ten minutes. And
that's it for preventing rear-end collisions. No real-time train tracking, no
radio communications between trains, and no collision avoidance automated
braking.
The players: Boston & Maine Railroad ran local-stop
passenger trains between Boston and Marlborough , using the main line to south Acton ,
where the trains would switch to tracks serving Maynard, Stow ,
Hudson and Marlborough .
The night of the accident, the train, comprised of an engine, a tender and four
coaches, left Union Station (same site as current North Station) at 7:16 p.m.,
making stops all along the way. Scores of people were returning to Maynard
after Sunday excursions in Boston .
Most were on the last car, as it was designated to be left behind at Maynard
before the rest of the train continued onward. Behind it, the overnight Montreal
Express - two engines, two milk cars, two baggage cars, a mail car, a Pullman
car, a smoker and two coaches - left Union Station at 7:45 p.m.
The local was running late and the operators were aware of
what was chasing them from behind. At the evidentiary hearing the flagman
reported he had dropped fusees east of the Lincoln
station, west of the Lincoln station, and again
a goodly distance before the Baker Bridge station in western Lincoln .
According to the report from the Board of Railroad
Commissioners, Horace Lyon, the engineer of the lead engine of the express stated that he
had seen the fusees, and had cut back power, but at most only lightly applied
brakes. The night was in general clear, but there may have been some obscuring
night fog in Lincoln , near the Sudbury River .
Regardless, Lyon testified that he did not see the rear lights of the
stopped train until within 100 yards, and even with emergency brakes, could not
stop in time.
Burned railroad car from the Baker Bridge Station, Lincoln, MA train wreck of Nov 26, 1905 (courtesy Maynard Historical Society) |
Newspaper reports of the time reported the accident as
occurring at 8:15 p.m., and resulting in 17 dead and 25-30 seriously injured.
Two of the dead were fireman on the Montreal-bound engines. The others were
passengers on the rear two cars of the local, either killed in the accident or
from the resulting fire, set by the lead engine of the express. The death toll
would have been higher except for railroad employees and passengers from both
trains braving the smoke and fire and risk of a boiler explosion to extract the
trapped and wounded.
The Maynard dead, and their ages:
William J. Barris 29
Irving H. Barris 3
Mary Campbell 27
Andrew Carlson 28
Josephine Carlson 22
Thomas Crowley 56
George Czujko 49
Hannah Desmond 40
Vladyslav Matisliewicz 26
William J. Barris 29
Irving H. Barris 3
Mary Campbell 27
Andrew Carlson 28
Josephine Carlson 22
Thomas Crowley 56
George Czujko 49
Hannah Desmond 40
Vladyslav Matisliewicz 26
The Barris's were father and son; the Carlson's husband and wife. Albert and Elfrida (Collins) Batley, married just two years, were among the
injured. Mrs. Batley lost part of a leg. The couple were later owners of Batley & Son Florists, with
more than 7,000 square feet of greenhouse buildings on Acton Street , behind the Fowler funeral
home.
One question the Commissioners asked - if the train was
stopped - why not send the rear flagman back on the tracks to flag the oncoming
train? Or at least put some torpedoes* on
the rails? This would have been the approved practice if the local train had
broken down and could not proceed. But that was not the case. The local had
just dropped off passengers, and was expected to be underway again within
minutes. Being off the train would have separated the flagman from his train.
Not in the newspaper article:
This account draws on reporting published in the Boston Globe and New York Times at the time of the accident, the collections of the Lincoln, MA public library and the Maynard Historical Society, and the railroad investigation of the incident. Source sites:
http://www.lincolnpl.org/Documents/baker%20bridge%20train%20accident.pdf
http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/56928697/
http://www3.gendisasters.com/massachusetts/6135/baker039s-bridge-station-ma-train-wreck-nov-1905
https://books.google.com/books?id=P_4WAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA57&lpg=PA57&dq=baker+bridge+station+train+accident&source=bl&ots=_vaUGlYnbM&sig=T7ZOAcSepgm-JlfqAh9MV0LotPo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VlysUpS_L9LesATykoKQCg#v=onepage&q=baker%20bridge%20station%20train%20accident&f=false
Interestingly, a 1922 report on medical causes of railroad accidents due to operator error specifically mentioned the Baker Bridge station accident as likely caused by undiagnosed and untreated neurosyphilis! Train operators and crew were known to have a much higher prevalence of syphilis compared to the population as a whole - thought to be a consequence of frequent travel away from family and access to prostitutes. [Chace AE, Hays GA. Railway Age. 1922;73(24):1103-05]
On a different note, a U.S. report circa 1905 - meaning before the era of cars and trucks and buses, there was an estimate that train and trolley accidents were responsible for approximately 10,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries each year. Currently, rail-related fatalities average around 1,000 per year, the great majority being a combination of people walking along or crossing tracks and vehicles hit while crossing tracks.
*A "torpedo" was a small metal packet, about half the size of a business card, filled with gunpowder. When a train's front wheels hit one, it would explode, thus warning the engineer of danger down the track. The torpedo was attached to a strip of lead four inches long. When the torpedo was set on the rail the lead would be bent down on either side in order to hold it in place. Several of these might have been placed on a rail to make sure the following train got the warning. Railroad workers being railroad workers, torpedoes were central to various practical jokes.
Not in the newspaper article:
This account draws on reporting published in the Boston Globe and New York Times at the time of the accident, the collections of the Lincoln, MA public library and the Maynard Historical Society, and the railroad investigation of the incident. Source sites:
http://www.lincolnpl.org/Documents/baker%20bridge%20train%20accident.pdf
http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/56928697/
http://www3.gendisasters.com/massachusetts/6135/baker039s-bridge-station-ma-train-wreck-nov-1905
https://books.google.com/books?id=P_4WAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA57&lpg=PA57&dq=baker+bridge+station+train+accident&source=bl&ots=_vaUGlYnbM&sig=T7ZOAcSepgm-JlfqAh9MV0LotPo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VlysUpS_L9LesATykoKQCg#v=onepage&q=baker%20bridge%20station%20train%20accident&f=false
Interestingly, a 1922 report on medical causes of railroad accidents due to operator error specifically mentioned the Baker Bridge station accident as likely caused by undiagnosed and untreated neurosyphilis! Train operators and crew were known to have a much higher prevalence of syphilis compared to the population as a whole - thought to be a consequence of frequent travel away from family and access to prostitutes. [Chace AE, Hays GA. Railway Age. 1922;73(24):1103-05]
On a different note, a U.S. report circa 1905 - meaning before the era of cars and trucks and buses, there was an estimate that train and trolley accidents were responsible for approximately 10,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries each year. Currently, rail-related fatalities average around 1,000 per year, the great majority being a combination of people walking along or crossing tracks and vehicles hit while crossing tracks.
Wikipeida image of torpedo on a rail Click on photo to enlarge |